ISPconfig3 und geblockete E-Mails

P

pezi

New Member
Ich stehe vor dem Probem, dass manche eingehene E-Mails für den Kunden geblockt werden. Der Kunde hat den Spam-Filter schon deaktviert - no entabled -

Trotzdem wird manche wichtige E-Mail (z.B. von der Bank) geblockt werden. (Log ist gekürzt und Zieladresse ist geändert)

Blocked SPAM, [91.212.136.3] [91.212.136.3] <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> -> <XXXX@hotel.invalid>, Message-ID: <OFB4B50954.0E85094E-ONC1257777.00242431-C1257777.0029A4FE@bawagpsk.com>, mail_id: VJgVLuoeH1FR, Hits: 7.242, size: 292327, 1089 ms

Was läuft hier schief?

Peter



PHP: 
connect from isc-mx.mymailwall.com[91.212.136.3]
Net::Server: 2010/08/06-09:33:34 CONNECT TCP Peer: "127.0.0.1:40339" Local: "127.0.0.1:10024"
idle_proc, hi : was idle, 675151.6 ms, total idle 19687.158 s, busy 45.539 s
loaded base policy bank
lookup_ip_acl (inet_acl): key="127.0.0.1" matches "127.0.0.1", result=1
process_request: fileno sock=12, STDIN=0, STDOUT=1
switch_to_my_time     480 s, new request
ESMTP< XFORWARD NAME=isc-mx.mymailwall.com ADDR=91.212.136.3\r\n
switch_to_my_time     480 s, SMTP XFORWARD received
ESMTP> 250 2.5.0 Ok XFORWARD
switch_to_client_time 480 s, smtp response sent
ESMTP< XFORWARD PROTO=SMTP HELO=scanlab01.mymailwall.com SOURCE=REMOTE\r\n
switch_to_my_time     480 s, SMTP XFORWARD received
ESMTP> 250 2.5.0 Ok XFORWARD
ESMTP< MAIL FROM:<XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> SIZE=292327\r\n
switch_to_my_time     480 s, SMTP MAIL received
check_mail_begin_task: task_count=17
lookup_ip_acl: key="91.212.136.3", no match
lookup [debug_sender] => undef, "XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" does not match
ESMTP> 250 2.1.0 Sender <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> OK
switch_to_client_time 480 s, smtp response sent
ESMTP< RCPT TO:<XXXX@hotel.invalid> ORCPT=rfc822;XXXX@hotel.invalid\r\n
switch_to_my_time     480 s, SMTP RCPT received
lookup_acl(XXXX@hotel.invalid), no match
lookup [local_domains] => undef, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
lookup_sql "XXXX@hotel.invalid", query args: "ARRAY(0xcb40010)", "ARRAY(0xc9f57d8)", "ARRAY(0xcae3a7c)", "ARRAY(0xcacbd1c)", "ARRAY(0xc930538)"
lookup_sql select: SELECT *,spamfilter_users.id FROM spamfilter_users LEFT JOIN spamfilter_policy ON spamfilter_users.policy_id=spamfilter_policy.id WHERE spamfilter_users.email IN (?,?,?,?,?) ORDER BY spamfilter_users.priority DESC
sql begin, nontransaction
sql: executing clause: SELECT *,spamfilter_users.id FROM spamfilter_users LEFT JOIN spamfilter_policy ON spamfilter_users.policy_id=spamfilter_policy.id WHERE spamfilter_users.email IN (?,?,?,?,?) ORDER BY spamfilter_users.priority DESC
lookup_sql, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no match
lookup_sql_field(message_size_limit), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup [message_size_limit] => undef, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
ESMTP> 250 2.1.5 Recipient <XXXX@hotel.invalid> OK
switch_to_client_time 480 s, smtp response sent
lookup [users.id] => undef, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
wbl: (SQL) recip <XXXX@hotel.invalid>, 0 matches
lookup [blacklist_recip<XXXX@hotel.invalid>] => undef, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
query_keys: XXXXi@bawagpsk.com, petra.stani@, bawagpsk.com, .bawagpsk.com, .com, .
lookup_hash(XXXXi@bawagpsk.com), no matches
lookup [blacklist_sender<XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>,blacklist_sender] => undef, "XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" does not match
lookup [whitelist_recip<XXXX@hotel.invalid>] => undef, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
query_keys: XXXXi@bawagpsk.com, petra.stani@, bawagpsk.com, .bawagpsk.com, .com, .
lookup_hash(XXXXi@bawagpsk.com), no matches
lookup [whitelist_sender<XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>,whitelist_sender] => undef, "XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" does not match
lookup_hash(XXXX@hotel.invalid) matches keys: "."=>ARRAY(0xa8d09a4)
lookup [score_recip<XXXX@hotel.invalid>,score_sender], 1 matches for "XXXX@hotel.invalid", results: "."=>[Amavis::Lookup::RE=ARRAY(0xa8d0794),HASH(0xa8d0800)]
lookup_re("XXXXi@bawagpsk.com"), no matches
query_keys: XXXXi@bawagpsk.com, petra.stani@, bawagpsk.com, .bawagpsk.com, .com, .
lookup_hash(XXXXi@bawagpsk.com), no matches
lookup [score_sender<XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>] => undef, "XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" does not match
prolong_timer spam_scan_sa_finish: timer set to 479 s
prolong_timer spam_scan: remaining time = 479 s
enqueue: stat is not numeric: ""
lookup_sql_field(spam_tag_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup: (scalar) matches, result="2"
lookup [spam_tag_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matches, result="2", matching_key="(constant:2)"
lookup_sql_field(spam_tag2_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup: (scalar) matches, result="6.2"
lookup [spam_tag2_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matches, result="6.2", matching_key="(constant:6.2)"
lookup [spam_tag3_level] => undef, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
lookup_sql_field(spam_kill_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup: (scalar) matches, result="6.9"
lookup [spam_kill_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matches, result="6.9", matching_key="(constant:6.9)"
lookup_sql_field(message_size_limit), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup [message_size_limit] => undef, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
lookup_sql_field(spam_lover), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup_hash(XXXX@hotel.invalid), no matches
lookup [Lovers2,spam_lovers] => undef, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
blocking contents category is (6) for XXXX@hotel.invalid
blocking ccat=6, SMTP response: 250 2.7.0 Ok, discarded, id=06471-17 - SPAM
do_notify_and_quar: ccat=Spam (6,0) ("6":Spam, "5":Spammy, "1,1":CleanTag, "1":Clean, "0":CatchAll) ccat_block=(6), qar_mth=
lookup_sql_field(spam_tag_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup: (scalar) matches, result="2"
lookup [spam_tag_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matches, result="2", matching_key="(constant:2)"
lookup_sql_field(spam_tag2_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup: (scalar) matches, result="6.2"
lookup [spam_tag2_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matches, result="6.2", matching_key="(constant:6.2)"
lookup_sql_field(spam_kill_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup: (scalar) matches, result="6.9"
lookup [spam_kill_level] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matches, result="6.9", matching_key="(constant:6.9)"
lookup_sql_field(spam_quarantine_to), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup: (scalar) matches, result="spam-quarantine"
lookup [spam_quarantine_to] => true,  "XXXX@hotel.invalid" matches, result="spam-quarantine", matching_key="(constant:spam-quarantine)"
lookup_sql_field(spam_quarantine_cutoff_level), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup [spam_quarantine_cutoff_level] => undef, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
lookup_sql_field(spam_admin), "XXXX@hotel.invalid" no matching records
lookup_hash(XXXX@hotel.invalid), no matches
lookup [spam_admin] => undef, "XXXX@hotel.invalid" does not match
lookup [spam_quarantine_bysender_to] => undef, "XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" does not match
header: X-Spam-Flag: YES\n
header: X-Spam-Score: 7.242\n
header: X-Spam-Level: *******\n
header: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.242 tag=2 tag2=6.2 kill=6.9 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001,\n\tDNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188,\n\tHTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.526, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]\n\tautolearn=no\n
header: X-Quarantine-ID: <VJgVLuoeH1FR>\n
header: X-Envelope-To-Blocked: <XXXX@hotel.invalid>\n
header: X-Envelope-To: <XXXX@hotel.invalid>\n
header: X-Envelope-From: <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>\n
header: Received: from mail.sciencesoft.at ([127.0.0.1])\n\tby localhost (mail.sciencesoft.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\n\twith ESMTP id VJgVLuoeH1FR for <XXXX@hotel.invalid>;\n\tFri,  6 Aug 2010 09:33:34 +0200 (CEST)\n
DO_QUARANTINE, local:spam-%m.gz, <> -> spam-quarantine
skip local delivery(3): <> -> <spam-quarantine>
one_response_for_all <>: success, r=0,b=0,d=0, ndn_needed=0, '250 2.6.0 Ok, skip local delivery(3), id=06471-17'
DO_QUARANTINE done
SPAM, <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> -> <XXXX@hotel.invalid>, Yes, score=7.242 tag=2 tag2=6.2 kill=6.9 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.526, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396] autolearn=no, quarantine VJgVLuoeH1FR (spam-quarantine)
skip admin notification, no administrators
do_notify_and_quarantine - done
prolong_timer quar+notif: remaining time = 479 s
DSN: sender NOT credible, SA: 7.242, <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>
lookup: (scalar) matches, result="10"
lookup [spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender] => true,  "XXXXi@bawagpsk.com" matches, result="10", matching_key="(constant:10)"
dsn: . 250 Spam <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> -> <XXXX@hotel.invalid>: on_succ=0, on_dly=1, on_fail=1, never=0, warn_sender=, DSN_passed_on=, mta_resp: "250 2.7.0 Ok, discarded, id=06471-17 - SPAM"
DSN: SUCC (discarded) . 250 Spam, destiny=DISCARD: <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> -> <XXXX@hotel.invalid>
one_response_for_all <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com>: all DISCARD, '250 2.7.0 Ok, discarded, id=06471-17 - SPAM'
notif=N, suppressed=0, ndn_needed=, exit=99, 250 2.7.0 Ok, discarded, id=06471-17 - SPAM
prolong_timer delivery-notification: remaining time = 479 s
fish_out_ip_from_received: 91.212.136.3
lookup_ip_acl (publicnetworks): key="91.212.136.3" matches "::FFFF:0:0/96", result=1
parse_ip_address_from_received: 91.212.136.3
Blocked SPAM, [91.212.136.3] [91.212.136.3] <XXXXi@bawagpsk.com> -> <XXXX@hotel.invalid>, Message-ID: <OFB4B50954.0E85094E-ONC1257777.00242431-C1257777.0029A4FE@bawagpsk.com>, mail_id: VJgVLuoeH1FR, Hits: 7.242, size: 292327, 1089 ms
 
P

pezi

New Member
Nach weiterem Investigieren - das Problem dürfte der
der Wert
sa_kill_level_deflt =
in amisd.conf zu tief (6.1) gesetzt war. Ich habe diesen nun 10 gesetzt.
 
L

Laubie

Member
Jetzt haben wir schon August... und der 2010-bug lebt immer noch ;)

Code: 
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188

mach mal ein

Code: 
sa-update

Laubie
 
Du musst dich einloggen oder registrieren, um hier zu antworten.

Werbung

Top